Language notes3.0 FORMAL SKILLS
Introduction
1.0 Effective reading
2.0 Writing
3.0 Formal skills
3.1 Grammar
3.2 Editing
4.0 Register
5.0 Report writing
6.0 Other professional communication
People who are confident that they know and can apply the `rules' of
grammar are a minority. There are many historical and social reasons for
this general lack of confidence in relation to grammar. Many people have
been given stronger messages about what they 'get wrong' as a writer, than
what they can do.
Many competent, published authors do not know the formal rules of
grammar. What they work with instead is a strong faith in their ability to
think, describe, explain, and a stronger belief that they can produce quality
writing by rewriting, refining and polishing. Instead of using 'rules', they are
depending on an intuitive sense that 'this...is an improvement on...that'. This
intuitive sense has probably been developed by wide reading. Of course,
most published writers have the advantage of having their work checked by
professional editors.
When most people talk about grammar, they are referring to the system
developed from Latin, latinate grammar. They are not aware that this is a
recently developed description for English. When Shakespeare was writing
he did not have this system to help him as a writer. Latinate grammar is only
one of several grammars. Two others are Chomsky's system of
transformational grammar and Halliday's system of functional grammar.
Plain English, clear writing and refinement in expression, and the control of
a range of registers, particularly academic register, are important features of
these communication subjects. Tutors will indicate where writing can be
improved and often this involves elements based on latinate grammar.
However, they do not have enough time to teach this system, or other
grammatical systems, in detail.
If you want to explore this area of latinate grammar further to develop your
confidence both as a writer and in everyday communication, many books
are available.
Some references are:
Bernard, J.R. (1896) A short guide to traditional grammar Parramatta,
NSW: Sydney University Press
Burt, A.(1991) A guide to better grammar Cheltenham, UK: Stanley
Thornes Publisher Ltd
Burt, A. (1991) A guide to better punctuation Cheltenham, UK: Stanley
Thornes Publisher Ltd
Burton, S. H. (1987) Mastering English grammar London: Macmillan
Education
Corbett, E.P.J. & Finkle, S.L. (1992) The little English handbook 6th
edn New York: HarperCollins
Fowler, H.W. (1991) A dictionary of modern English usage Oxford:
Oxford University Press
Gowers, E. (1987) The complete plain words Oxford: Oxford University
Press 3.2 Punctuation
The following information on punctuation is taken, with permission, from
Christie, Frances (ed) (1989) Writing in schools: study guide Geelong:
Deakin University
The golden rule of editing is to keep your writing and your ego separate at
all times!
Distance yourself from what you have written by putting as much time as
practical between finishing your writing and beginning your editing; at least
leave it overnight. If you have no time at all, read your work aloud to
yourself. Always try to approach your work as an outside editor would.
A key question to address is Who is the audience?
- A specialist in the writer's field?
- An intelligent layperson?
The intended reader(s) should always determine the writer's register (see
section 4.0 Register). Keeping the appropriate register in mind throughout
editing will make the task easier and more successful.
3.3.1 Editing checklist
3.3.1.1 First stage - wholeness
- refocus on topic
- skim-read whole report
- note purpose, context, register
- has all the content been included?
3.3.1.2 Second stage - balance and sequence of the whole
- examine the relative emphasis given to each section/point
- do the headings and sub-headings provide a cohesive structure and
outline?
- are the headings and subheadings in sequence?
3.3.1.3 Third stage - focus on the parts
- examine section/paragraph structure
- is each section/paragraph relevant to the writer's purpose?
- is each necessary?
- is each in its proper place?
- are connections between sections/paragraphs clear?
- do ideas follow one another clearly and logically?
3.3.1.4 Fourth stage - focus on mechanical faults; syntax, punctuation,
spelling
- is each sentence clear and easy to read?
- is each sentence necessary?
- does it repeat something already written?
- could the meaning of any sentence be expressed more clearly?
- are any words or terms overused?
- are any words unnecessary or ambiguous?
- are any words repetitious?
- could shorter or clearer words be used?
- do all words suit the register being used?
- check spelling and grammar.
- are all of your revisions improvements?
3.3.1.5 Produce amended version
- check layout and presentation
Repeat this process until the report is ready for the intended audience.
Professional editors can repeat this from three to twenty times.
For assistance contact: paul.skrebels@unisa.edu.au
Copyright ©1997 University of South Australia
Prepared by the Flexible Learning Centre, University of South Australia
Prepared: 28 January 1997
URL: http://www-i.roma.unisa.edu.au/07118/language/formal.htm
|